Odds per adjusted standard deviation: comparing strengths of associations for risk factors measured on different scales and across diseases and populations.
Identifieur interne : 000154 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000153; suivant : 000155Odds per adjusted standard deviation: comparing strengths of associations for risk factors measured on different scales and across diseases and populations.
Auteurs : John L. HopperSource :
- American journal of epidemiology ; 2015.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Age Factors, Biomarkers, Tumor, Body Mass Index, Breast Neoplasms (epidemiology), Breast Neoplasms (genetics), Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Genes, BRCA1, Genes, BRCA2, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms (genetics), Probability, Regression Analysis, Research Design, Risk Factors.
- MESH :
- chemical : Biomarkers, Tumor.
- epidemiology : Breast Neoplasms.
- genetics : Breast Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms.
- Age Factors, Body Mass Index, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Genes, BRCA1, Genes, BRCA2, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Probability, Regression Analysis, Research Design, Risk Factors.
Abstract
How can the "strengths" of risk factors, in the sense of how well they discriminate cases from controls, be compared when they are measured on different scales such as continuous, binary, and integer? Given that risk estimates take into account other fitted and design-related factors-and that is how risk gradients are interpreted-so should the presentation of risk gradients. Therefore, for each risk factor X0, I propose using appropriate regression techniques to derive from appropriate population data the best fitting relationship between the mean of X0 and all the other covariates fitted in the model or adjusted for by design (X1, X2, … , Xn). The odds per adjusted standard deviation (OPERA) presents the risk association for X0 in terms of the change in risk per s = standard deviation of X0 adjusted for X1, X2, … , Xn, rather than the unadjusted standard deviation of X0 itself. If the increased risk is relative risk (RR)-fold over A adjusted standard deviations, then OPERA = exp[ln(RR)/A] = RR(s). This unifying approach is illustrated by considering breast cancer and published risk estimates. OPERA estimates are by definition independent and can be used to compare the predictive strengths of risk factors across diseases and populations.
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwv193
PubMed: 26520360
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 000042
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 000042
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 000076
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 000E27
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 000E27
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 000E27
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000151
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 000154
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Odds per adjusted standard deviation: comparing strengths of associations for risk factors measured on different scales and across diseases and populations.</title><author><name sortKey="Hopper, John L" sort="Hopper, John L" uniqKey="Hopper J" first="John L" last="Hopper">John L. Hopper</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:26520360</idno><idno type="pmid">26520360</idno><idno type="doi">10.1093/aje/kwv193</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000042</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000042</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000076</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000E27</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000E27</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000E27</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000151</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000154</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000154</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Odds per adjusted standard deviation: comparing strengths of associations for risk factors measured on different scales and across diseases and populations.</title><author><name sortKey="Hopper, John L" sort="Hopper, John L" uniqKey="Hopper J" first="John L" last="Hopper">John L. Hopper</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">American journal of epidemiology</title><idno type="e-ISSN">1476-6256</idno><imprint><date when="2015" type="published">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Age Factors</term><term>Biomarkers, Tumor</term><term>Body Mass Index</term><term>Breast Neoplasms (epidemiology)</term><term>Breast Neoplasms (genetics)</term><term>Epidemiologic Methods</term><term>Female</term><term>Genes, BRCA1</term><term>Genes, BRCA2</term><term>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</term><term>Humans</term><term>Ovarian Neoplasms (genetics)</term><term>Probability</term><term>Regression Analysis</term><term>Research Design</term><term>Risk Factors</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Biomarkers, Tumor</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="epidemiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Breast Neoplasms</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>Breast Neoplasms</term><term>Ovarian Neoplasms</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Age Factors</term><term>Body Mass Index</term><term>Epidemiologic Methods</term><term>Female</term><term>Genes, BRCA1</term><term>Genes, BRCA2</term><term>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</term><term>Humans</term><term>Probability</term><term>Regression Analysis</term><term>Research Design</term><term>Risk Factors</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">How can the "strengths" of risk factors, in the sense of how well they discriminate cases from controls, be compared when they are measured on different scales such as continuous, binary, and integer? Given that risk estimates take into account other fitted and design-related factors-and that is how risk gradients are interpreted-so should the presentation of risk gradients. Therefore, for each risk factor X0, I propose using appropriate regression techniques to derive from appropriate population data the best fitting relationship between the mean of X0 and all the other covariates fitted in the model or adjusted for by design (X1, X2, … , Xn). The odds per adjusted standard deviation (OPERA) presents the risk association for X0 in terms of the change in risk per s = standard deviation of X0 adjusted for X1, X2, … , Xn, rather than the unadjusted standard deviation of X0 itself. If the increased risk is relative risk (RR)-fold over A adjusted standard deviations, then OPERA = exp[ln(RR)/A] = RR(s). This unifying approach is illustrated by considering breast cancer and published risk estimates. OPERA estimates are by definition independent and can be used to compare the predictive strengths of risk factors across diseases and populations.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Hopper, John L" sort="Hopper, John L" uniqKey="Hopper J" first="John L" last="Hopper">John L. Hopper</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/OperaV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000154 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000154 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Musique
|area= OperaV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:26520360
|texte= Odds per adjusted standard deviation: comparing strengths of associations for risk factors measured on different scales and across diseases and populations.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:26520360" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a OperaV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.21. |  |